Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;2019:9767313. doi: 10.1155/2019/9767313

Table 3.

Performance of the models for predicting CRKP infection at different cutoff values.

No. of risk factors TP FP TN FN Se (%) Sp (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Acc (%)
Derivation cohort
1 244 256 7 0 100 3 49 100 50
2 244 235 28 0 100 11 51 100 54
3 244 215 48 0 100 18 53 100 58
4 233 183 80 11 96 30 56 88 62
5 219 120 143 25 90 54 65 85 71
6 200 68 195 44 82 74 75 82 78
7 175 31 232 69 72 88 85 77 80
8 147 18 245 97 60 93 89 72 77
9 110 11 252 134 45 96 91 65 71
10 56 5 258 188 23 98 92 58 62
11 30 3 260 214 12 99 91 55 57
12 15 0 263 229 6 100 100 53 55
13 6 0 263 238 3 100 100 52 53
Validation cohort
1 147 183 5 0 100 3 45 100 45
2 147 176 12 0 100 6 46 100 47
3 147 166 22 0 100 12 47 100 50
4 143 141 47 4 97 25 50 92 57
5 136 96 92 11 93 49 59 89 68
6 126 57 131 21 86 70 69 86 77
7 113 31 157 34 77 84 78 82 81
8 94 20 168 53 64 89 82 76 78
9 67 13 175 80 46 93 84 69 72
10 27 7 181 120 18 96 79 60 62
11 12 3 185 135 8 98 80 58 59
12 6 0 188 141 4 100 100 57 58
13 2 0 188 145 2 100 100 56 57

TP: number of true positives; FP: number of false positives; FN: number of false negatives; TN: number of true negatives; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; Acc: rate of accuracy of the risk score model.