Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;35(2):223–229. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12150

Table 4.

Summary of previous studies with regard to burst pacing protocol & predictive values

Author & Year AF type & sample size Induction Protocol Definition of inducibility PPV NPV
Oral et al5 2004 pAF (100) Burst (15 s) AF >1 min 33% 85%
Essebag et al6 2005 pAF (60), non‐pAF (42) Burst (5 s at 200 ms) AF/AT > 10 s 47% 72%
Richter et al7 2006 pAF (166), non‐pAF (68) Decremental burst AF >1 min 54% 69%
Jaïs et al11 2006 pAF (74) Decremental burst (10 s) AF ≥10 min NR NR
Chang et al8 2007 pAF (88) Decremental burst (5‐10 s) AF/AT >1 min 55% 81%
Satomi et al12 2008 pAF (60) Decremental burst (10 s) AF >10 min 41% 58%
Crawford et al13 2010 pAF (112) Decremental burst (10s) AF ≥1 min 40% 76%
Leong‐Sit et al9 2013 pAF (78), non‐pAF (66) Decremental burst (15 beats) AF/AT ≥2 min 49% 51%
Santangeli et al10 2018 pAF (201), non‐pAF (104) Decremental burst (15 beats) AF/AT ≥2 min 31% 76%
The Present study Non‐pAF (98) Decremental burst (30 beats) AF/AT ≥5 min 30% 75%
Non‐pAF with enlarged LA (40) Decremental burst (30 beats) AF/AT ≥5 min 41% 89%