Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0215150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215150

Table 2. Population characteristics and weighted univariate analysis of risk factors associated with premedication use.

Characteristics (n with available data) Total (n = 1494) Weighted univariate analysisa
Premedication (n = 76) No premedication (n = 1418) P-valueb
Sex No. (%) (n = 1494)
Male 803 (53.7) 48 (56.1) 755 (55.3)) 0.860
Female 691 (46.3) 28 (43.9) 663 (44.7)
GA (weeks) (n = 1494)
Mean (SD) 27.8 (2.2) 29.7 (2.1) 28.5 (2.5) <0.01
Median [IQR] 28.0 [26.0–29.0] 30 [28–31] 28 [27–30] <0.01
Range 23–34 25–34 23–34
Birth weight (g) (n = 1494)
Mean (SD) 1070 (362) 1432 (464) 1167 (430) < .001
Median [IQR] 1000 [795–1300] 1391 [1037–1767] 1074 [840–1440] < .001
Range 370–2610 620–2290 370–2610
Mode of delivery “vaginal” (n = 1486), No. (%) 546 (36.7) 20 (69.7) 526 (64.9) 0.280
Maternal general anesthesia (n = 1448), No. (%) 217 (15.0) 7 (7.4) 210 (15.4) 0.016
Intrauterine Growth Restriction (n = 1494), No. (%) 208 (13.9) 9 (9.7) 199 (14.5) 0.136
1 min Apgar score (n = 1462)
Median [IQR] 6 [3–8] 8 [6–9] 6 [3–8] < .001
Range 0–10 1–10 0–10
Exogenous surfactant in the DR (n = 1467), No (%) 757 (51.6) 53 (66.1) 704 (45.8 <0.001
Period of birth “Day” (n = 1439), No. (%) 679 (47.2) 41 (59.7) 638 (48.1) 0.014

a All results (except n) are weighted to take into account differences in the sampling process between GA groups.

b Mann-Whitney’s, t-test or chi square tests for comparisons between premedicated and non-premedicated infants.