Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 12;2016(9):CD011567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011567.pub2

Summary of findings 7. SSRIs compared to SNRIs for adults with panic disorder.

SSRIs compared to SNRIs for adults with panic disorder
Patient or population: adults with panic disorder
 Settings: outpatient
 Intervention: SSRI
 Comparison: SNRI
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
SNRI SSRI
failure to respond 
 Follow‐up: 12 weeks 232 per 1000 223 per 1000 
 (174 to 285) RR 0.96 
 (0.75 to 1.23) 991
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
total number of dropouts 
 Follow‐up: 2 weeks 181 per 1000 201 per 1000 
 (134 to 298) RR 1.11 
 (0.74 to 1.65) 991
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2  
failure to remit 
 Follow‐up: 12 weeks 577 per 1000 606 per 1000 
 (525 to 698) RR 1.05 
 (0.91 to 1.21) 991
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
panic symptoms 
 Follow‐up: 12 weeks   The mean panic symptoms in the intervention groups was
 0.12 lower 
 (0.33 lower to 0.10 higher)   945
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high  
number of dropouts due to adverse effects 56 per 1000 104 per 1000 
 (27 to 393) RR 1.86 
 (0.49 to 7.05) 991
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low3,4  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Downgraded one point due to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 53%)
 2 Downgraded one point due to imprecision: 95% CI ranges from appreciable benefit with SSRIs to appreciable benefit with SNRIs
 3 Downgraded one point due to substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 76%)
 4 Downgraded one point due to serious imprecision: 95% CI ranges from no difference to benefit with SNRIs