Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 12;2016(9):CD011567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011567.pub2

Comparison 2. TCAs versus benzodiazepines.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Failure to respond 1 61 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.63, 1.67]
1.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 1 61 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.63, 1.67]
2 Total number of dropouts 6 1295 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.67 [0.93, 2.99]
2.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 5 980 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.87 [1.47, 2.37]
2.2 Clomipramine versus BDZs 1 315 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.49, 0.98]
3 Failure to remit 2 848 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.19 [1.00, 1.41]
3.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 2 848 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.19 [1.00, 1.41]
4 Panic symptoms ‐ endpoint score 2 998 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.25 [‐1.72, 1.22]
4.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 1 777 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.5 [0.21, 0.79]
4.2 Clomipramine versus BDZs 1 221 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.00 [‐1.37, ‐0.63]
5 Panic symptoms ‐ mean change 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [‐0.83, 1.63]
5.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 1 44 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [‐0.83, 1.63]
6 Frequency of panic attacks 6 458 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.30 [‐0.81, 1.41]
6.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 5 237 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [‐0.44, 1.94]
6.2 Clomipramine versus BDZs 1 221 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.6 [‐3.17, ‐0.03]
7 Agoraphobia 4 949 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.04 [‐0.08, 0.17]
7.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 4 949 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.04 [‐0.08, 0.17]
8 General anxiety 7 1238 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.08 [‐0.28, 0.45]
8.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 6 1017 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.22 [0.10, 0.35]
8.2 Clomipramine versus BDZs 1 221 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.67 [‐0.94, ‐0.40]
9 Depression 5 765 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.08 [‐0.22, 0.06]
9.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 5 765 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.08 [‐0.22, 0.06]
10 Social functioning 3 882 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.09, 0.42]
10.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 3 882 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.09, 0.42]
11 Quality of life 0 0 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
12 Patient satisfaction 0 0 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
13 Economic costs 0 0 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
14 Number of dropouts due to adverse effects 2 848 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.10 [1.13, 3.93]
14.1 Imipramine versus BDZs 2 848 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.10 [1.13, 3.93]
15 Number of patients experiencing at least one adverse effect 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]