Garvey 1989.
Methods | Study design: Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants |
Diagnosis: DSM‐III panic disorder with agoraphobia Method of diagnosis: Not stated Age: M = 40.0 (SD = 12) Sex: 61% women Location: USA; setting unclear Co‐morbidities: patients with MDD, alcoholism during the previous six months, current or past mania or psychotic disorder, major medical problems were excluded Rescue medication: Not stated |
|
Interventions |
Participants were randomly assigned to either: (1) alprazolam arm Duration: 3 weeks Treatment Protocol: dosage gradually increased to a maximum of 6 mg (2) diazepam arm Duration: 3 weeks Treatment Protocol: dosage gradually increased to a maximum of 60 mg (3) placebo arm Duration: 3 weeks Total number of randomised patients = 30; number of patients per arm not provided. |
|
Outcomes | The study is about urinary MHPG levels in relation to Panic Disorder treatment. Time points for assessment: before the beginning of treatment and after 3 weeks of treatment Outcomes: 1. MHPG urinary levels 2. Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) |
|
Notes |
Date of study: Not stated Funding source: Not stated Declarations of interest among the primary researchers: Not stated. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "thirty consecutive patients meeting study criteria were randomly assigned" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote "double‐blind treatment". No further details. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote "double‐blind treatment". No further details. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study on urinary MHPG levels; HAMA mentioned in methods section, but no results reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Sponsorship bias cannot be ruled out. |