Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 12;2016(9):CD011567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011567.pub2

GSK‐29060/525.

Methods Study design: Randomised controlled trial
Participants Diagnosis: Panic disorder; no further details provided
Method of diagnosis: Not stated
Age: for paroxetine, M = 37.12 (SD = 9.92); for clomipramine, M = 40.13 (SD = 11.34)
Sex: for paroxetine, 14 women, 23 men, 1 unknown; for clomipramine 17 women, 14 men
Location: China; setting unclear
Co‐morbidities: patients with current major depression were excluded. No other co‐morbidities mentioned
Rescue medication: Not stated
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to either:
(1) paroxetine arm (n = 38)
Duration: 10 weeks
Treatment Protocol: flexible dosage; range = 10 ‐ 50 mg, M and SD not provided
(2) clomipramine arm (n = 35)
Duration: 10 weeks
Treatment Protocol: flexible dosage; range = 50 ‐ 100 mg, M and SD not provided
Outcomes Time points for assessment: baseline, endpoint (10 weeks)
Outcomes:
1. mean change from baseline in the number of full panic attacks
2. Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA)
3. Panic Associated Symptoms Scale
4. Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness Score (CGI‐S)
5. Patient Global Evaluation (PGE)
Notes Date of study: September 1998 to September 1999
Funding source: GSK
Declarations of interest among the primary researchers: Not stated.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomized".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blind". No further details.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double‐blind". No further details.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "ITT population consisted of all subjects who received treatment and have one post treatment evaluation".
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes were reported.
Other bias High risk Sponsored by GSK; the role of the funder in planning, conducting and writing the study is not discussed.