Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;2016(9):CD009837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009837.pub2

Toassi 2002

Methods Study design: before‐and‐after study (2 active arms)
Conducted in: Brazil
Unit of randomisation: individual
Unit of analysis: individual
Setting: schools, Santa Teresa
Funded by: not disclosed or reported
Duration of the study: Study commenced in 1999 ‐ end period not reported
Participants Inclusion criteria: not reported
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Age at baseline: between 5 and 14 years
Total at baseline: 135
N (controls baseline): 61
N (controls follow‐up): 61
N (interventions baseline): 74
N (interventions follow‐up): 74
Recruitment: not reported
Gender: 59% male, 41% female
Interventions Intervention: dental caries preventive programme
  • Delivery of toothbrushes and toothpaste every 3 months, daily toothbrushing in schools, weekly mouthwash fluoride solution at 0.2%, quarterly application of fluoride gel on the toothbrush and quarterly health education and motivational interviewing


Control: dental caries preventive program but no motivational interviewing
Duration of intervention: Group A received 1 motivational session, and Group B received 4 motivational sessions (no specific time period reported)
Outcomes Plaque index, gingival bleeding index
Implementation related factors Theoretical basis: pedagogical motivational approaches
Resources for implementation: educational materials, toothbrushes, toothpaste, audiovisual resources
Who delivered the intervention: unclear
PROGRESS categories assessed at baseline: income
PROGRESS categories analysed at outcome: not reported
Outcomes related to harms/unintended effects: not reported
Intervention included strategies to address diversity or disadvantage: not reported
Economic evaluation: not reported
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Students were randomly divided into 2 groups
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear