Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 18;2016(9):CD006992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006992.pub2

Reich 1987.

Methods Parallel randomised controlled clinical trial
Randomisation ratio: 1:1
Superiority design
Participants Inclusion criteria: people with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy
Exclusion criteria: significant surgery within 3 months before entry into the study, major organ or system disease, medication use affecting glucose metabolism or sulphonylurea activity
Diagnostic criteria: not stated
Interventions Number of study centres: 2
Treatment before study: intervention: 36.5 (6.3) insulin, placebo: insulin 48.2 (4.0) U/day. Insulin regimen: only intermediate insulin
Titration period: 12 days hospitalisation (after 6 weeks optimisation glycaemic control with insulin)
Outcomes Primary outcome(s) (as stated in the publication): serum and urinary glucoses, HbA1c, urinary C‐peptide, insulin dose, number of tablets prescribed, compliance
Study details Total study duration: 5.5 months
Run‐in period: 12 days
Study terminated early (for benefit/because of adverse events): no
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding source: Upjohn
Publication status: peer‐reviewed journal
Stated aim of study Quote from publication: "To test the effect of combined glibenclamide‐insulin therapy over 4 months in 20 patients after achieving good control of fasting glucose with diet and intermediate insulin alone."
Notes Participants had adequate glycaemic control
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote from publication: "randomised"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote from publication: "randomised by the hospital pharmacy"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 HbA1c, FPG, lipids Low risk Quote from publication: (from abstract) "A placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded design..."
Comment: Probably the participants and the personnel were blinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Insulin dose Low risk Quote from publication: (from abstract) "A placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded design..."
Comment: probably the participants and the personnel were blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 HbA1c, FPG, lipids Unclear risk Comment: unclear if the outcome assessor was blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Insulin dose Unclear risk Comment: unclear if the outcome assessor was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 HbA1c, FPG, lipids Unclear risk Comment: not all outcome values were reported, only graphical
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Insulin dose Low risk Comment: insulin dose was collected and reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: not all outcome values were reported, only graphical
Comment: dropouts were described; intention‐to‐treat
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: funded by a pharmaceutical company