Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 18;2016(9):CD006992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006992.pub2

Relimpio 1998.

Methods Parallel open‐label randomised controlled clinical trial
Randomisation ratio: 1:1
Superiority design
Participants Inclusion criteria: poorly controlled (HbA1c > 8%) people with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy (≥ 0.5 IU/kg body weight in 2 or more daily doses))
Exclusion criteria: life‐threatening condition, contraindication for biguanides, serum creatinine < 132.6 μmol/L
Diagnostic criteria: not stated
Interventions Number of study centres: 1
Treatment before study: intervention: 47.9 (10) insulin, control: insulin 51.8 (9.6) U/day. Insulin regimen: twice or more daily, premixed soluble and NPH insulin or NPH insulin alone
Titration period: 4 weeks increase metformin dose (1,275 g ‐> 2,550 g)
Outcomes Primary outcome(s) (as stated in the publication): HbA1c, glucose, lipids, blood pressure, height, weight, BMI, insulin dose, serum creatinine, albumin excretion rate, uric acid, compliance
Study details Total study duration: 4 months
Run‐in period: 4 weeks
Study terminated early (for benefit/because of adverse events): no
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding source: Novo Nordisk
Publication status: peer‐reviewed journal
Stated aim of study Quote from publication: "To compare the effect of adding metformin to insulin therapy with a moderate increase in insulin dose alone in insulin‐treated, poorly controlled type 2 diabetes."
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote from publication: "... and were subsequently randomised (31 to insulin + metformin and 29 to insulin dose increase)"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "patients were randomised into two study groups following an experimental design of open‐label randomisation."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Adverse events High risk Quote from publication: "open‐label randomisation"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 HbA1c, FPG, lipids High risk Quote from publication: "open‐label randomisation"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Insulin dose High risk Quote from publication: "open‐label randomisation"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Adverse events High risk Quote from publication: "open‐label randomisation"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 HbA1c, FPG, lipids High risk Quote from publication: "open‐label randomisation"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Insulin dose High risk Quote from publication: "open‐label randomisation"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Adverse events Unclear risk Comment: data on weight gain were collected and reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 HbA1c, FPG, lipids Low risk Comment: outcome data were collected and reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Insulin dose Low risk Comment: data on insulin dose were collected and reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes of interest were reported
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: funded by a pharmaceutical company