Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 17;2012(10):CD006469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006469.pub2

Freedman 1980.

Methods Randomised Phase II trial
1975
Participants 59 women with recurrent squamous cell cervical cancer
Interventions Arm 1: sequential cyclophosphamide 8 mg/kg iv d1‐5 q28 then adriamycin 80 mg/m2 iv d1 q28 then hexamethylmelamine 8 mg/kg po daily continuously
Arm 2: sequential adriamycin 80 mg/m2 iv d1 q28 then cyclophosphamide 8 mg/kg iv d1‐5 q28 then hexamethylmelamine 8 mg/kg po daily continuously
Arm 3: sequential hexamethylmelamine 8 mg/kg po daily continuously then cyclophosphamide 8 mg/kg iv d1‐5 q28 then adriamycin 80 mg/m2 iv d1 q28
Not stated prospectively what criteria would be for switching treatment (i.e. number of cycles versus progressive disease)
Outcomes Response rates
Survival time after chemotherapy start
Survival from time of treatment change
Notes 1 patient excluded (died prior to starting chemotherapy). No ITT analysis performed. Cross‐over between arms allowed. Reasons for switching chemotherapy agents varied and included disease progression, toxicity and cumulative doxorubicin dose
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Stratified by ease of disease evaluation then randomised
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not documented
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Not documented, but OS unlikely to be affected by blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Published report included all pre‐specified outcomes
Other bias High risk Patients allowed to switch between arms for variety of reasons including toxicity, cumulative doxorubicin dose and disease progression