Van der Linde 2011.
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. | |
Participants | Women and men between 18 and 45 years of age (mean of age 33 years). Total participants = 242; 63 randomised with congenital aortic valve stenosis and peak aortic valve velocity of 2.5 m/s. The median follow‐up was 2.4 years. Baseline Characteristics of Participants: Men: 70% (rosuvastatin group) and 73% (placebo group). Bicuspid Valve: 93% (rosuvastatin group) and 88% (placebo group). Tricuspid Valve: 7 % (rosuvastatin group) and 12% (placebo group). Mean Pressure Gradient, mean (± SD) mmHg = 27 (± 10) (rosuvastatin group) and 32 (± 17) (placebo group). Peak Pressure Gradient, mean (± SD) mmHg = 48 (± 18) (rosuvastatin group) and 56 (± 28) (placebo group). Aortic Valve Area, mean (± SD) cm² = 1.3 (± 0.4) (rosuvastatin group) and 1.3 (± 0.5) (placebo group). Peak AS Velocity, mean (± SD) m/s = 3.4 (± 0.7) (rosuvastatin group) and 3.6 (± 0.9) (placebo group). Most of the participants had a previous intervention (surgical valvulotomy or balloon valvuloplasty) and none or a grade 1 of aortic regurgitation. Systolic blood pressure, mean (± SD) mmHg = 129 (± 16) (rosuvastatin group) and 131 (±16) (placebo group). Diastolic blood pressure, mean (± SD) mmHg = 76 (± 10) (rosuvastatin group) and 78 (± 10) (placebo group). Aortic valve calcium = 40% (rosuvastatin group) and 36% (placebo group). Left ventricular hypertrophy = 20% (rosuvastatin group) and 33%(placebo group). LDL value, (± SD) = 106 mg/dL (± 31) (rosuvastatin group) and 104 mg/dL (± 35) (placebo group). |
|
Interventions | Rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 30) or matching placebo (n = 33). | |
Outcomes | Primary outcome: progression of peak aortic valve velocity. Secondary outcome: temporal changes in the left ventricular mass, ascending aortic diameter and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide. |
|
Notes | Study Site: 6 tertiary referral centres for congenital heart disease in The Netherlands and Belgium. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Rosuvastatin and placebo groups were randomised using a computer program at the Erasmus Medical University Center pharmacology department, which had no access to the rest of data. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A randomisation number was sent by pharmacology department to the site co‐ordinator and the study medication to the participants. The participants were unaware of the treatment assignment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, physicians and investigators were blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The investigators that evaluated all outcomes were blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients who withdrew from the study were well‐described all the randomised patients were evaluated. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol is not available, but all data were properly reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | There was no other bias. The study did not received support from any organisations. |
LDL: low‐density lipoprotein SD: standard deviation