Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD006812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006812.pub3

Comparison 1. Combination therapy versus Ifosfamide.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Overall survival 2 373 Hazard Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.60, 0.94]
2 Progression‐free survival 2 373 Hazard Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.58, 0.90]
3 G3‐4 Nausea/vomiting 2 365 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.53 [1.33, 9.37]
4 Diarrhoea and other GI 2 365 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.51 [0.31, 7.52]
5 Haematological 2 365 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.56 [0.84, 2.90]
6 Genitourinary 2 365 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.68 [0.54, 5.18]
7 Cardiovascular 2 365 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.13, 3.11]
8 Hepatic 1 174 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.05 [0.73, 5.74]
9 Neuropathy 2 365 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.59 [0.99, 2.55]