Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 9;2014(4):CD004121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004121.pub3

Comparison 2.

Regression of CIN 2 and 3

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Partial or complete regression of CIN 2 or CIN 3 2 41 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.35 [1.03, 5.35]
2 Complete regression of CIN 2 or CIN 3 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.17 [0.48, 9.76]
3 Partial regression of CIN 2 or CIN 3 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.71 [0.64, 11.43]