Alberts 2008.
Methods | This was a multicentre, open‐label, two‐arm phase III randomised controlled trial Trial duration: enrolment from January 29, 2002 to March 31, 2004. Trial duration not specified Trial location: Europe, North and South America |
|
Participants | Number of participants: 847 participants (426 intervention, 421 control), 774 ovarian cancer (OC), 73 primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: not stated |
|
Interventions | Intervention: Chemotherapy plus interferon‐gamma 1b (IFN‐γ 1b) Chemotherapy included paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) followed by carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks. A total of 6 cycles of chemotherapy were given unless disease progression or dose‐limiting toxicity occurred or patients refused further treatment Interferon therapy included 100μg administered subcutaneously, 3 times weekly (every other day; no more than 3 days in a 7‐day period) continuously (including the 3 weeks following the last dose of chemotherapy) Control: Chemotherapy alone consisting of Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) followed by carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks. A total of 6 cycles of chemotherapy were given unless disease progression or dose‐limiting toxicity occurred or patients refused further treatment |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Ethics approval: this was not reported on Informed consent: patients provided informed consent between January 29, 2002 and March 31, 2004 Funding: this was not reported on Correspondence with authors: dalberts@azcc.arizona.edu on 3rd July 2012 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned how randomisation was carried out |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported on |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Open‐label trial but unlikely to affect outcomes. Control group received chemotherapy alone |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Disease progression was assessed by an endpoint review committee blinded to the treatment assignment using serial CT scans, MRIs, physical exams, and CA‐125 levels |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | ITT analysis was done 79% of participants adhered to treatment (i.e, undertook at least 5 out of 6 courses) in the treatment arm and 86% adhered in the control arm. 34% of adherent participants died in the intervention arm while 28% died in the control arm. 61% of non‐adherent participants died in the intervention arm while 45% of non‐adherent participants died in the control arm. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol was not available |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Study stopped early due to DSMB (data and safety monitoring board) recommendation ‐ this was due to the study finding a statistically significant difference between treatment groups that crossed the pre‐specified boundaries for inferiority and futility. |