Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 3;2016(3):CD005008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005008.pub4

Comparison 1. Infusion duration less than 6 hours versus infusion duration 6 hours or more.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1.1 Clinical heart failure 5 557 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.27 [0.09, 0.81]
1.2 (Sub)clinical heart failure combined 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.2.1 (Sub)clinical heart failure combined (subclinical defined as >=10% decrease in LVEF) 1 82 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.46, 1.26]
1.2.2 (Sub)clinical heart failure combined (subclinical defined as >=15% decrease in LVEF) 1 52 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.03, 2.78]
1.2.3 (Sub)clinical heart failure combined (subclinical defined as a fall in LVEF of > 20%) 1 62 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.04 [0.00, 0.60]
1.2.4 (Sub)clinical heart failure combined (subclinical defined as a decrease in LVEF) 1 240 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.15, 0.90]
1.3 Response rate 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.3.1 Response rate (defined as complete or partial remission) 2 292 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.20 [0.65, 2.22]
1.3.2 Response rate (defined as good response) 1 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.23 [0.91, 1.66]
1.4 Overall survival 2 322 Hazard Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.42 [0.61, 3.30]