Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 3;2016(3):CD005008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005008.pub4

Comparison 3. Liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) peak dose 25 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Response rate (defined as objective palliative tumour response (i.e. decrease in PSA levels of >= 50%)) 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.07 [0.00, 1.13]
3.2 Adverse effects other than cardiac damage 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.2.1 Gastrointestinal toxicity grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.01, 3.08]
3.2.2 Tachycardia grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.06 [0.00, 1.00]
3.2.3 Arrhythmia grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.39 [0.04, 3.52]
3.2.4 Dyspnoea grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.10, 2.20]
3.2.5 Palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 5.91 [1.45, 24.16]
3.2.6 Hepatic toxicity grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.05, 0.79]
3.2.7 Leukopenia grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.24 [0.03, 1.87]
3.2.8 Thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.39 [0.02, 9.15]
3.2.9 Haemoglobin‐related toxicity grade 3 or 4 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.07 [0.00, 1.13]