Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;2016(9):CD011511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011511.pub2

1. Sensitivity analysis: random‐effects versus fixed‐effect models.

Analysis Random‐effects model Fixed‐effect model
People with 1 or more exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids (risk difference) (RD ‐0.01, 95% CI ‐0.04 to 0.02) (RD ‐0.03, 95% CI ‐0.07 to 0.01)
ACT/C‐ACT score (MD ‐0.08, 95% CI ‐0.70 to 0.54) (MD ‐0.09, 95% CI ‐0.64 to 0.46)
People with 1 or more serious adverse event due to any cause (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.89) (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.85)
People with 1 or more study‐defined exacerbation (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.99) (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.91)
% eosinophils, lower airway (MD ‐0.38, 95% CI ‐1.92 to 1.15) (MD ‐0.26, 95% CI ‐1.35 to 0.83)
Peak expiratory flow rate (MD 3.16, 95% CI ‐13.40 to 19.72) (MD 4.09, 95% CI ‐1.34 to 9.52)
People withdrawing from the trial (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.58) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.59)

Sensitivity analyses are presented only for those outcomes where results of analyses using random‐effects versus fixed‐effect models are non‐identical.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; OR, odds ratio; RD, risk difference.