Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub3

Gibon 2011

Methods RCT.
Participants 80 participants of 4 radiotherapy teams comprising secretaries (16%), physicists (7.5%), nurses (49%), doctors (27.5 %).
Interventions 38 hours of CST; not described in detail.
Outcomes HCP communication skills rated using the scale LaComm* on audio of simulated breast cancer patient (SP) interview at baseline and post‐intervention (or equivalent timings for control group).
Notes For some communication skill outcomes, course attendees (intervention group) had significantly more appropriate behaviours/skills than those who had not attended; these included a team orientated focus (P = 0.023), empathy (P = 0.037) and emotional words (P = 0.030).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk 83% follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No details of data extracted using LaComm*.
Other bias High risk Some differences in baseline characteristics of two groups including work experience in oncology, full‐time occupation, and % of non‐professionals.