Methods | RCT of follow‐up consolidation sessions after both groups had basic training. | |
Participants | 63 physicians (62% oncologists) from Belgium hospitals, age 43+/‐7, 55% men, with average 14 years of experience in oncology and 43% no prior CST. All had participated in a 19‐hour CST workshop (consisting of two, 8‐hour/day sessions and one, 3‐hour evening session). 59 cancer patients, undergoing a 'breaking news' interview (67% women mean age 58 years). 53 cancer patients (65% women mean age 60 years) in encounters with relatives (48% women mean age 57 years). |
|
Interventions | Six, 3‐hour per evening, bimonthly, consolidation sessions over three months. | |
Outcomes | HCP (doctors) outcomes:
Patient outcomes:
Significant other outcomes:
|
|
Notes | There was no effect of consolidation workshops on doctors' ability to detect patient distress. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | 72 participants "randomly assigned". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Raters blinded for time (pre/post) and group. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 81% follow‐up for SP and RP; and 77% follow‐up for RP interview with significant other. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All pre‐specified outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | Baseline characteristics of the two HCP groups were similar. Baseline scores of patient anxiety were markedly higher in patients seen by the control group. |