Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 9;2013(7):CD006910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006910.pub2

2. Platinum sensitivity status and median survival times in participants of included studies.

Platinum‐resistant data (PFI ≤6 months)
STUDY NAME Other drug arm PLD arm N (other drug) N (PLD) Median TTP for other arm in weeks Median TTP for PLD arm in weeks Median TTD for other arm in weeks Median TTD for PLD arm in weeks Comment
Colombo 2012 PAT PLD 412 416 16 16 57 54 17% of these women had non‐measurable disease.
Mutch 2007 GEM PLD 99 96 15 13 54 58 36% of these women with non‐measurable disease.
Gordon 2001 TOP PLD 125 130 14 9 41 36 It is unclear why survival in the PLD arm of this PR subgroup is so much shorter than that of the other trials.
ASSIST‐3 2007 CAN/carbo PLD NA NA 15 15 NA NA Limited available data. Additional data were requested from Telik but not obtained.
Kaye 2012 OLA PLD 16 14 NA NA NA NA Small study, subgroup data not available.
MITO‐3 2008 GEM PLD 43 43 NA NA NA NA Subgroup data not available.
PRECEDENT 2013 EC145/PLD PLD 100 49 21 12 60 72 Unpublished OS data. Study was not adequately powered to assess OS.
OVA‐301 2010 TBD/PLD PLD 118 124 17 16 61 53 Subgroup analysis was pre‐planned for PFS but was exploratory for OS.
ASSIST‐5 2010 CAN/PLD PLD 65 60 24 16 NA NA Pre‐planned subgroup analysis favoured the CAN/PLD group for PFS. Final OS results were not published. Additional data were requested from Telik but not obtained.
Partially platinum‐sensitive data (PFI 6‐12 months)
CALYPSO 2010 PAC/carbo PLD/carbo 183 161 38 40 NA NA PFS HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.90, P value 0.004) from Gladieff 2012;
OS HR = 1.01 (0.80 to 1.28) from Wagner 2012.
OVA‐301 2010 TBD/PLD PLD 123 90 32 24 96 71 TTP data from Poveda 2011 and exploratory TTD data from Monk 2012. PFS HR = 0.65 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.92; P value 0.015; OS HR =0.64 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.86; P value 0.0027).
Platinum‐sensitive data (PFI > 6months)
Gordon 2001 TOP PLD 111 109 23 29 70 108 Exploratory analysis. The greatest effect was seen in the PPS subgroup (N=112; HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.07‐2.34; P value 0.021).
OVA‐301 2010 TBD/PLD PLD 215 202 39 32 116 103 Subgroup analysis was pre‐planned for PFS but was exploratory for OS.
SWOG S0200 2008 carbo PLD/carbo 30 31 34 51 77 133 Small study which closed early.
HeCOG 2010 PAC/carbo PLD/carbo 96 93 46 51 126 106  
CALYPSO 2010 PAC/carbo PLD/carbo 509 466 40 48 141 132  
Platinum‐resistant and platinum‐sensitive data combined
MITO‐3 2008 GEM PLD 76 77 20 16 51 56 PR + PPS.
Kaye 2012 OLA PLD 32 33 38 30 NA 76 PR + PPS. Unpublished TTD data obtained from investigators. Phase II study not powered to assess survival.
Gordon 2001 TOP PLD 235 239 17 16.1 60 63 PR + PS.
O'Byrne 2002 PAC PLD 107 107 22 22 56 46 PR + PS; preliminary data.
OVA‐301 2010 TBD/PLD PLD 337 335 31 25 95 81 PR + PS.

Conversions from published data (months to weeks) were performed assuming one month to be 4.3 weeks, and then rounding the answer to the nearest week.

*This is from the comparison CAN versus active control (PLD and TOP data combined). The PLD group had an improved PFS compared with the TOP group but we were unable to obtain separate data.

Abbreviations: NA = not available; ; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; TTP = time to progression; TTD = time to death; PFI = platinum‐free interval; PR = platinum‐resistant (recurrence within 6 months of platinum‐based therapy); PPS = partially platinum‐sensitive (recurrence of 7 to 12 months of platinum‐based therapy); PS = platinum‐sensitive (recurrence >12 months after platinum‐based therapy); PRef = platinum‐refractory (recurrence within 1 month of, or during, platinum‐based therapy); PLD = pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; GEM = gemcitabine; TOP = topotecan; TBD = trabectedin; CAN = canfosfamide; PAT = patupilone; OLA = olaparib; PAC = paclitaxel; carbo = carboplatin