Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007064.pub2

Johansson 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 481
Interventions Individual psychological support, intensified primary health care (liaison improved and training for nurses and GPs) and nutritional support (dietary assessment and advice)
Outcomes EORTC QLQ‐30, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS
Theoretical Basis CBT
Cancer Site Breast, GI (GI = colorectal or gastric), prostate
Mode of Delivery Face to face and telephone when travel distance was an issue
Notes Nutritional dietary support and liaison with general practice staff (including training for GPs and nurses) also formed part of the intervention
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated random allocation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.