Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007064.pub2

Kanzaki 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 26
Interventions Counselling and journal writing based on stress coping theory (Lazarus) and Social Learning theory (Bandura)
Outcomes Depression and Anxiety Mood Scale, General Self Efficacy Scale, Stress Response Scale
Theoretical Basis CBT
Cancer Site Gastric
Mode of Delivery Face‐to‐face
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Concealed from staff
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.