Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007064.pub2

Mishel 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 239
Interventions Patient‐led telephone CBT intervention with supplemental audio/video tapes provided
Outcomes MMSE, Uncertainty in illness scale, Cancer knowledge scale, (subscales reported; symptom distress or QOL and problem solving and cognitive restructuring as self‐control scale)
Theoretical Basis CBT
Cancer Site Prostate
Mode of Delivery Combination of telephone and audio/video media
Notes Number of participants in each arm not reported (one arm included family member) also 0.1 significance level used
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Block randomisation (randomisation process not described)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Open random allocation schedule
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.