Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD007064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007064.pub2

Stanton 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 558
Interventions An 80‐min face‐to‐face meeting and video tape with manual provided, followed with a 30‐min telephone meeting
Outcomes SF‐36 (Vitality Scale), CES‐D, Revised Impact of Events Scale, Post‐traumatic Growth Scale
Theoretical Basis CBT
Cancer Site Breast
Mode of Delivery Combination
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number tables
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Concealed random number allocation
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.