Kaleita 2006
| Methods | Randomised controlled trial, parallel arm, double‐blind. | |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria: aged 21‐65, primary brain tumour, receiving treatment in the UCLA Neuro‐Oncology Program, prior neurosurgical resection, radiotherapy, and/or cytotoxic or cytostatic chemotherapy, mild to severe fatigue and/or attention/memory impairment, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale, able to speak English, capable of completing self‐rating scales and one‐on‐one psychometric tests, at least 30 days since prior stimulants (e.g., amphetamines or methylphenidate), negative pregnancy test and use of contraception if fertile, concurrent conventional chemotherapy (e.g., carboplatin, lomustine, temozolomide), glucocorticoids (e.g. dexamethasone) and tamoxifen allowed. Exclusion criteria: significant hepatic disease, significant renal disease, severe cognitive impairment, other terminal illness, emergency patient, institutional resident, prisoner or parolee, UCLA students or staff, pregnant or nursing, concurrent irinotecan, concurrent participation in UCLA experimental chemotherapy trials, prior modafinil, concurrent experimental anticancer medication, concurrent tricyclic antidepressants and/or monoamine oxidase inhibitors. No. randomised: 30 (each arm not reported). Follow‐up: 1, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Setting: one centre in the United states. |
|
| Interventions | Arm I: 200 mg/day modafinil in divided doses for 3 weeks Arm II: 400 mg/day modafinil in divided doses for 3 weeks Both arms then completed a 1‐week wash out period, followed up 200 mg/day modafinil for 3 days, followed by a titrated dose for 8 weeks. |
|
| Outcomes | Cognitive function (TMT, SDM, verbal fluency test) Fatigue (Fatigue severity scale, Visual analogue fatigue scale, modified fatigue impact scale) Mood (HDS) |
|
| Notes | All participants required to have mild or severe fatigue. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Use of a randomisation method reported but not described. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Blinding carried out. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding carried out. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding carried out. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Projected accrual successful. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | All participants required to have mild or severe fatigue. |