Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 13;2016(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub3
Methods Design: Longitudinal Internet survey
Recruitment: Via websites selling or informing about ECs and online EC forums
Setting: Online survey (open to all nationalities; of respondents, 34% US, 24% France, 8% UK, 6% Switzerland, 28% other countries)
Inclusion criteria: Aged 18 years and older
Exclusion criteria: none stated
Participants One‐month survey
Total N: 477, mean age 42, 41% women, 59% had a diploma giving access to university, 28% daily or occasional smokers, 76% daily EC users. 50/477 occasional or daily smokers at baseline
One‐year survey
Total N: 367, mean age 43, 42% women, 59% had a diploma giving access to university, 24% daily or occasional smokers, 79% daily EC users. 35/367 occasional or daily smokers at baseline
Interventions Observational; no specific intervention. Participants that had completed a baseline questionnaire were emailed one month and one year later and asked to provide follow‐up data on EC use and smoking behaviour
Outcomes From among those that were smoking cigarettes at baseline
7‐day PP abstinence from smoking at 12 months
Smoking consumption (change from baseline) at 12 months
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Prospective cohort
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not randomized
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk Although there is no blinding, the study design and lack of intervention or contact with researchers mean that there is unlikely to be significantly impact on performance
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Although there is no blinding, the study design and lack of intervention or contact with researchers mean that there is unlikely to be significantly impact on detection
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk 28% (N = 367) for those who answered the baseline survey (N = 1329) provided data at 1‐year follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to determine prespecified outcomes