Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;2016(7):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4

Comparison 1. MI versus no MI (assessment only and alternative intervention) at ≥ 4 months follow‐up.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Quantity of alcohol consumed 33 7971 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.11 [‐0.15, ‐0.06]
2 Frequency of alcohol consumption 17 4377 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐0.21, ‐0.07]
3 Binge drinking 21 5479 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.04 [‐0.09, 0.02]
4 Alcohol problems 25 6868 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.08 [‐0.17, ‐0.00]
5 Average BAC 5 901 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.05 [‐0.18, 0.08]
6 Peak BAC 13 2790 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.12 [‐0.20, ‐0.05]
7 Drink‐driving 4 1205 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.13 [‐0.36, 0.10]
8 Risky behaviour 7 1579 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.15 [‐0.31, 0.01]