Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;2016(7):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4

Comparison 2. MI versus no MI (assessment only and alternative intervention) at < 4 months follow‐up.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Quantity of alcohol consumed 39 5600 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.17 [‐0.25, ‐0.09]
2 Frequency of alcohol consumption 24 3296 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.18 [‐0.29, ‐0.07]
3 Binge drinking 25 4090 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.13 [‐0.23, ‐0.03]
4 Alcohol problems 34 5109 Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐0.18, ‐0.01]
5 Average BAC 6 1096 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐0.30, 0.01]
6 Peak BAC 14 2408 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.23 [‐0.32, ‐0.13]
7 Drink‐driving 4 895 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.22 [‐0.38, ‐0.06]
8 Risky behaviour 5 745 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.05 [‐0.33, 0.22]