Stein 2006.
Methods |
Design: RCT Follow‐up: 3 months Attrition: 17% |
|
Participants |
Mean age (years): 17.06 Sex: 89.5% male N participants: 105 Allocation: n = 59 intervention; n = 46 control Setting: state juvenile correctional facility; higher risk substance using youth Country: USA |
|
Interventions |
Programme type: motivational interviewing Set‐up: individual single session Key components: developing rapport, exploration of motivation (pros and cons), personalised assessment feedback, imagining the future with and without change, and establishing goals Duration: 90 min with 60 min booster session Control: alternative intervention |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes: risky behaviours including driving under the influence of alcohol Measures: adaptation of Young Adult Drinking and Driving Questionnaire |
|
Funding and Declared Conflicts of Interest | Funded by NIDA. No information or declarations about potential conflicts of interest. | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Low attrition (17%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible to blind participants to intervention. Insufficient information to make a judgement about blinding of therapists |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Unit of Analysis issues | Low risk | Not applicable |