Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Bois 1997.

Methods RCT
Approved by the institution and informed consent obtained
Setting: Canada
Funding: industry
Participants 124 patients scheduled for elective abdominal aortic surgery were recruited
Interventions Treatment group: TEA (T6‐T7 or T7‐T8) with bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl 10 mcg/mL adjusted for VAS scores ≤ 3 for 48 hours (n = 55)
Control group: IV PCA with morphine for 48 hours (n = 59)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes VAS scores at rest at 8 and 24 hours
Hospital LOS (days)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "prospectively randomized", no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 4 participants with TEA and 6 with PCA were excluded because of failure of Holter monitoring or epidural
 analgesia, or because use of analgesia was not included in the protocol
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Groups well balanced
Not in intention‐to‐treat
One participant was initially ascribed to the epidural group and received postoperative PCA instead because of a failed epidural (2 dural punctures during performance of the epidural). This participant was not excluded from the study