Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Brodner 2001.

Methods RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Setting: Denmark
Funding: unspecified
Participants 30 patients undergoing radical cystectomy with formation of an ileal neobladder
Interventions Treatment group: TEA (T9‐T11) with ropivacaine 0.5% during the intraoperative period and 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery. IV piritramide thereafter (n = 15)
Control group: IV piritramide (n = 15)
All participants received general anaesthesia
Outcomes VAS on movement at 24, 48 and 72 hours
Time to first faeces
Anastomotic leak
Notes Study includes a third group collected after the first 2 groups
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomly allocated", no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up mentioned
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Low risk Groups well balanced except for blood losses