Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

El‐Refai 2003.

Methods RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Setting: Egypt
Funding: unspecified
Participants 30 ASA 1 or 2 women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy
Exclusion criteria were history of hepatic or renal disease, myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months and general anaesthesia within the previous 3 months
Interventions Treatment group: lumbar (L3‐L4 or L4‐L5) epidural with 3 mL of 2% lidocaine as a test dose followed by 9 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine for a sensory level at T10, and 5 mL every hour thereafter (n = 15)
Control group: IV patient‐controlled analgesia with morphine (n = 15)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes Pain at 30 minutes after surgery: 1.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.4 ± 1.4
Notes No outcomes of interest measured at our selected time points
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "randomly allocated", no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Low risk Groups well balanced