Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Elkaradawy 2011.

Methods RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Setting: Egypt
Funding: unspecified
Participants 50 ASA 2 type 2 diabetic patients undergoing open cholecystectomy with negative stress exercise test and at least 2 cardiac risk factors preoperatively
Exclusion criteria were history of coronary heart disease; hypertension; respiratory, renal or hepatic insufficiency; or contraindication to epidural analgesia
Interventions Treatment group: thoracic (T7‐T8 and advanced 3 cm) epidural analgesia with 15 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and fentanyl 2 mcg/mL followed by 5 to 8 mL/h of 0.1% ropivacaine plus fentanyl 1 mcg/mL at 5 to 8 mL/h for 24 hours (n = 25)
Control group: IV patient‐controlled analgesia with morphine (n = 25)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes Pain: less pain with epidural analgesia
Notes Results not extractable. Study authors contacted on 15 June 2014, but did not reply
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "block‐wise balanced randomization"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "on cards sealed into opaque envelopes", "opened after taking decision to operate"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "neutral observer blinded with anaesthetic and analgesic techniques"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results provided
Other bias Low risk Groups well balanced