Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Gambling 2009.

Methods RCT
Approved by ethics committees (multi‐centre) and written informed consent obtained
Setting: United States of America
Funding: industry
Participants Adult patients aged 18 years or older with ASA 1 to 3, who were scheduled to undergo total abdominal hysterectomy, prostatectomy or colon resection under general anaesthesia
Exclusion criteria were pregnancy or lactation, any present or past disease or condition or prior post‐surgical complication that might increase the risk associated with surgery or risk of post‐surgical complications, sleep disorder (e.g. sleep apnoea, narcolepsy, excessive daytime sleepiness) and history of substance abuse. Patients who underwent treatment with clonidine or daily opioids for longer than 7 days before enrolment or who used any long‐acting opioid, ketorolac or cyclo‐oxygenase 2 inhibitor for 48 hours before surgery were excluded
Interventions Treatment group: epidural catheter at an unspecified level. Test dose with 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 mcg/mL. Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 mL before surgical incision plus extended‐release morphine 15 mg injected 15 (28 enrolled/28 analysed), 30 (30 enrolled/28 analysed) or 60 minutes (29 enrolled/22 analysed) after bupivacaine dose. Catheters were removed at the end of surgery. IV PCA with fentanyl after surgery
Control group: epidural catheter at an unspecified level. Test dose at the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist. Extended‐release epidural morphine 15 mg. Catheters were removed at the end of surgery. IV PCA with fentanyl after surgery (29 enrolled/27 analysed)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes VAS scores on movement at 8, 24 and 48 hours after surgery
Vomiting
Notes Study also included a group given bupivacaine alone not retained for this review
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "computerized randomization system"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Patient numbers were assigned by the study‐site pharmacist using an interactive voice recognition system"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Study medications were prepared and administered by unblinded pharmacists and anaesthesiologists, respectively, none of whom were involved in study assessments
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinded assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 16 participants withdrew from the study early because of withdrawal of consent (n = 2), loss to follow‐up (n = 1), change in surgery (n = 2) or other reasons (n = 11, all unique reasons such as bleeding risk, investigator withdrawal and unsuccessful epidural catheterization). 15 of these participants did not receive study drug (extended‐release morphine or placebo) and were excluded from analyses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Groups well balanced
Not in intention‐to‐treat