Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Jayr 1993.

Methods RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Setting: France
Funding: charity (plus a contribution from the industry)
Participants 163 patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery for cancer via midline or bilateral subcostal incision
Interventions Treatment group: TEA (T7‐T11) inserted before surgery. Used intraoperatively and postoperatively. Bupivacaine for surgery and bupivacaine 0.125% plus morphine for postoperative analgesia for 5 days (n = 78)
Control group: morphine infusion through a subcutaneous catheter for 5 days (n = 75)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes VAS scores at rest at 24, 48 and 72 hours
VAS scores on coughing at 24, 48 and 72 hours (taken as on movement)
Hospital LOS
Notes Recovery of intestinal gas transit occurred earlier in the EP group than in the SC group (P value < 0.05). Data expressed as cumulative % of participants with recovery from day 2 to day 5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stratified by history of bronchopulmonary disease
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Subcutaneous catheter located and dressed as an epidural. Solutions filled and labelled by the pharmacy
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Subcutaneous catheter located and dressed as an epidural. Solutions filled and labelled by the pharmacy
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 10 participants excluded from analysis: early postoperative complications (n = 4), ventilator dependence (n = 1), associated thoracotomy (n = 1), intraoperative anaphylaxis (n = 1) and surgery cancelled after randomization (n = 3) ‐ 4 from the epidural group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Groups well balanced except that more smokers were included in the subcutaneous group
Not in intention‐to‐treat