Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Mallinder 2000.

Methods RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and written informed consent obtained
Setting: United Kingdom
Funding: industry
Participants 40 ASA 1 to 3 patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery
Interventions Treatment group: LEA (L2‐L3 or L3‐L4) with bupivacaine 0.25% during surgery (n = 12)
Control group: IV morphine (n = 20)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes Anastomotic leak
Hospital LOS
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomly allocated", no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Technical monitoring difficulties meant that complete data were collected on only 32 participants (12 epidural and 20 morphine).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Trend towards longer operating time (143 (54) vs 130 (45) minutes) and greater blood loss (1045 (753) vs 785 (887) mL) in the morphine group, but this did not reach significance
Not in intention‐to‐treat