Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Muehling 2009.

Methods RCT
Approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent obtained from all patients
clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT 00615888
Setting: Germany
Funding: unspecified
Participants All patients admitted with indications for elective open repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm were eligible for the
 study
Interventions Treatment group: TEA (T7 and T10) in PCEA with ropivacaine 0.2% and sufentanil 2 mcg/mL (n = 50). Used intraoperatively and postoperatively for an unspecified duration
Control group: IV PCA with piritramide (n = 49)
General anaesthesia for all participants
Outcomes Hospital LOS
Notes Study authors contacted on 21 July 2014, for additional information but did not reply
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "randomized block design prepared by the Department of Biometry, University of Ulm"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "After they gave written informed consent, patients were randomly assigned"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk One participant in each group withdrew written informed consent and was excluded, leaving 50 participants in the traditional group and 49 in the fast‐track group, who were studied in an intention‐to‐treat
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias Unclear risk Other treatment modalities differ between the 2 groups as per protocol
Analysed in intention‐to‐treat