Norman 1997.
Methods | RCT Approved by the ethics committee and written informed consent obtained from all patients Setting: United States of America Funding: unspecified |
|
Participants | 42 male patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic replacement | |
Interventions |
Treatment group: TEA (T9‐T10 or T10‐T11) with bupivacaine intraoperatively only and morphine thereafter (n = 22) Control group: IV PCA with morphine (n = 20) General anaesthesia for all participants |
|
Outcomes | Hospital LOS | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "randomized", no details |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Three participants eliminated for protocol violation |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Groups well balanced Not in intention‐to‐treat: 2‐failed epidurals excluded |