Ozcan 2004.
Methods | RCT Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained Setting: Turkey Funding: unspecified |
|
Participants | 60 ASA 1 to 2 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy through a Pfannenstiel incision Patients with systemic disease, alcohol and opioid dependency or chronic pain and/or those with contraindication to regional anaesthesia were excluded |
|
Interventions |
Treatment groups: lumbar epidural analgesia (L2‐L3 or L3‐L4; catheter advanced 4 to 5 cm passed the needle tip) with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 mcg/kg of fentanyl 20 minutes before (n = 20) or after surgical incision (n = 20) Control group: 10 mL saline through epidural catheter before surgical incision (n = 20) All participants had an epidural catheter installed and tested with 3 mL of 2% lidocaine. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 7 mg/kg and vecuronium 0.02 mg/kg and maintained with nitrous oxide 50%, isoflurane 0.5% to 1.5% |
|
Outcomes | Pain scores (0 to 10) at 6, 24 and 48 hours after surgery | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "sealed envelope technique" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "sealed envelope technique" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results provided |
Other bias | Low risk | Groups well balanced |