Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Ozcan 2004.

Methods RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Setting: Turkey
Funding: unspecified
Participants 60 ASA 1 to 2 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy through a Pfannenstiel incision
Patients with systemic disease, alcohol and opioid dependency or chronic pain and/or those with contraindication to regional anaesthesia were excluded
Interventions Treatment groups: lumbar epidural analgesia (L2‐L3 or L3‐L4; catheter advanced 4 to 5 cm passed the needle tip) with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2 mcg/kg of fentanyl 20 minutes before (n = 20) or after surgical incision (n = 20)
Control group: 10 mL saline through epidural catheter before surgical incision (n = 20)
All participants had an epidural catheter installed and tested with 3 mL of 2% lidocaine. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 7 mg/kg and vecuronium 0.02 mg/kg and maintained with nitrous oxide 50%, isoflurane 0.5% to 1.5%
Outcomes Pain scores (0 to 10) at 6, 24 and 48 hours after surgery
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "sealed envelope technique"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "sealed envelope technique"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results provided
Other bias Low risk Groups well balanced