Scheinin 1982.
Methods | RCT Informed consent obtained Setting: Finland Funding: unspecified |
|
Participants | 40 ASA 1 to 3 patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery | |
Interventions |
Treatment group: thoracic (catheter tip at T9‐T10) epidural with 2 injections of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% at 4 hours apart (n = 10) Control group: epidural with 2 (n = 10) or 4 mg of morphine (n = 10) |
|
Outcomes | Pain at 4 hours after anaesthesia | |
Notes | No outcomes of interest available for our selected time points Study also includes a group without epidural |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "randomly allocated", no details |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "treated double‐blind: the anaesthetist performing the epidural injection was unaware of which drug or dose was injected" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Study authors did not specify the identity of the outcome assessor |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All results reported |
Other bias | High risk | A considerable difference in duration of surgery was noted among groups. Participants' demographics (such as age and ASA) were not fully reported, so we cannot evaluate whether the backgrounds of participants were well balanced |