Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2

Scheinin 1982.

Methods RCT
Informed consent obtained
Setting: Finland
Funding: unspecified
Participants 40 ASA 1 to 3 patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery
Interventions Treatment group: thoracic (catheter tip at T9‐T10) epidural with 2 injections of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% at 4 hours apart (n = 10)
Control group: epidural with 2 (n = 10) or 4 mg of morphine (n = 10)
Outcomes Pain at 4 hours after anaesthesia
Notes No outcomes of interest available for our selected time points
Study also includes a group without epidural
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomly allocated", no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "treated double‐blind: the anaesthetist performing the epidural injection was unaware of which drug or dose
 was injected"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Study authors did not specify the identity of the outcome assessor
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All results reported
Other bias High risk A considerable difference in duration of surgery was noted among groups. Participants' demographics (such as age and ASA) were not fully reported, so we cannot evaluate whether the backgrounds of participants were well balanced