Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;2016(7):CD001942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001942.pub5

Sullivan 2007.

Methods Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomised, factorial trial
Participants 552 participants randomised and 496 included in final outcome assessment
Referred for assessment and treatment within 72 hours of paralysis onset.
All participants aged ≥ 16 years and no contraindications to corticosteroids or antiviral therapy
Sex: male 253 (51%), female 243 (49%)
Age: mean (± SD) 44 (± 16.4) years
Interventions Participants allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups to receive:
  • aciclovir

  • prednisolone

  • aciclovir with prednisolone

  • placebo


Participants received prednisolone 25 mg twice daily for 10 days or aciclovir 400 mg 5 times daily for 10 days, both treatments or neither treatment, depending on allocation
Outcomes Primary outcome:
  • recovery rated on House‐Brackmann scale, where recovery was grade I


Secondary outcomes:
  • health‐related quality of life

  • Health Utilities Index Mark 3

  • facial appearance (Derriford Appearance Scale)

  • pain

  • adverse effects

  • frequency of incomplete recovery at end of study


Follow‐up at 3 and 9 months
Final outcomes reported at 9 months
Funding Supported by a grant (02/09/04) from the Health Technology Assessment Programme of the National Institute for Health Research (Department of Health, England). The Scottish Executive (Chief Scientist Office and National Health Service Education for Scotland) funded the Scottish School of Primary Care during the study. Practices were reimbursed for their contributions through national Support for Science mechanisms
Conflicts of interest Drs Sullivan and Donnan reported receiving grant support from GlaxoSmithKline for projects unrelated to the trial. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article reported
Date conducted June 2004 to June 2006
Notes Multicentre: 17 hospitals
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "... patient was randomly assigned to a study group by an independent, secure, automated telephone randomisation service"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk All parties blinded to allocation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants not receiving active drug received placebo. All administered medication was identical and in identical containers
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Assessors blinded to treatment group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Frequency and reason for drop‐outs documented:
138 assigned to prednisolone, of whom 127 completed the trial: 3 received an incorrect drug and 11 were lost to follow‐up (4 withdrew consent, 2 sought active treatment, 1 did not provide primary outcome data, 4 could not be contacted after the 1st visit)
141 assigned to placebo of whom 122 completed the trial: 19 were lost to follow‐up (6 withdrew consent, 3 could not be contacted, 3 sought active treatment, 1 did not provide primary outcome data, 3 could not be contacted after the 1st visit, 2 died, 1 withdrawn by investigator)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All planned outcome measures reported
Other bias Low risk No other potential sources of bias identified