Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub5

Acharya 2004.

Methods Double‐blind, randomized, controlled, cross‐over trial
Painful intervention: venipuncture
Study location: NICU at Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK
Study period: not stated.
Participants 39 healthy preterm neonates (mean 30.5 (SD 2.3) weeks' GA), mean PNA 27.2 (SD 24.4) days
Interventions 2 mL 25% (0.5 g) sucrose (n = 39) via syringe over 2 min into infant's mouth before 2 routine venipunctures
 2 mL water (n = 39) via syringe over 2 min into infant's mouth before 2 routine venipunctures
Outcomes Rise in HR, oxygen saturation, duration of first cry, total duration of crying, NFCS at the 3 phases of the venipuncture
Notes Data were reported using means, SDs over the 3 phases of the venipuncture. Data could not be abstracted for the 2 groups prior to cross‐over. Adverse effects were evaluated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Selected from random number table by a hospital pharmacist
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation controlled by a hospital pharmacist
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Interventions blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessments were done blinded to intervention group
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inconsistent number of infants reported in Methods section (n = 39) versus discussion section (n = 28)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The study protocol was not available to us so we could not judge whether there were any deviations from it
Other bias Low risk Appears free of other bias