Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub5

Blass 1997.

Methods RCT
Painful intervention: heel lance
Study location: Tompkins Community Hospital, Ithaca, New York, USA
Study period: not stated
Participants 72 newborn infants (PNA 22 h to 40 h)
Interventions 2 mL 12% sucrose (n = 8)
 2 mL protein solution (Provimin) (n = 8)
 2 mL lactose (n = 8)
 2 mL dilute fat (coconut and soy oil blend) (n = 8)
 2 mL concentrated fat (n = 8)
 2 mL fat and lactose solution (n = 8)
 2 mL Ross Special Formula (RSF ‐ artificial milk) (n = 8)
 2 mL Similac (artificial milk) (n = 8)
Solutions were given via syringe over a 2‐min period
Outcomes Crying time (percentage of procedure time spent crying, percentage of time spent crying during 3‐min recovery period, number of infants that cried 20% or more during each recovery minute)
Notes Sucrose vs. water, Similac vs. water and RSF vs. water were compared using Mann‐Whitney U test. Most results were presented in graph form and means were reported in the text and could not be combined in meta‐analyses
 Adverse events were not evaluated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Similac group could not be concealed because appearance differed from other intervention solutions
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Sucrose and water solutions blinded
However, Similac group was high risk as its appearance differed from sucrose or water
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Sucrose and water solutions blinded. However, Similac group was high risk as its appearance differed from sucrose or water
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes reported for all randomized infants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The study protocol was not available to us so we could not judge whether there were any deviations from it
Other bias Unclear risk Several test solutions were gifts from Ross Laboratories