Carbajal 1999.
Methods | RCT Painful intervention: venipuncture Study location: maternity ward, Poissy Hospital, Poissy, France Study period: April to end of June 1997 |
|
Participants | 150 term newborn infants, 3 to 4 days old | |
Interventions | 2 min prior to venipuncture the allocated solution was adminstered for 30 seconds by a sterile syringe into the infant's mouth No treatment (n = 25) 2 mL sterile water (n = 25) 2 mL 30% glucose (n = 25) 2 mL 30% sucrose (n = 25) Pacifier alone (n = 25) 2 mL 30% sucrose followed by pacifier (n = 25) |
|
Outcomes | DAN scale during venipuncture, reported as median and IQR | |
Notes | Mann‐Whitney U test used to evaluate pain scores Adverse effects were evaluated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequence generated by random number table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocated by sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Low risk for sucrose and water solutions High risk for pacifier groups |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Low risk for sucrose and water solutions High risk for pacifier groups |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No withdrawals |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The study protocol was not available to us so we could not judge whether there were any deviations from it |
Other bias | Low risk | Appears free of other bias |