Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub5

Gray 2015.

Methods RCT
Painful intervention: vaccination (hepatitis B)
Study location: University of Chicago Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Study period: July to August 2008
Participants 29 healthy, full‐term newborns undergoing vaccination
Exclusion criteria included preterm birth (< 37 weeks’ completed PMA), birthweight < 2 kg, any Apgar score < 6, congenital abnormalities, medical complications, or drug exposure. Infants with previous oxygen administration, ventilatory support, or NICU admission were excluded
Interventions Sucrose group (n = 15): 1.0 mL 24 % sucrose 2 min before vaccination
Sucrose + warmth group (n = 14): 1.0 mL 24% sucrose 2 min before vaccination + radiant warmth from an infant warmer before the vaccination
Infants in the sucrose + warmth group were placed under an Ohmeda Ohio Infant Warmer (Model No. 3000; GE Healthcare, Fairfield, CT), and their clothing was removed, except for a diaper (nappy)
Outcomes Duration of cry and grimace (s), HR variability and HR
Notes Duration of cry and grimace were provided as means and SDs and in graph form. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and HR reported in graph form
Both groups received sucrose
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "We randomly assigned each infant in the study to sucrose alone or sucrose plus warmer groups by using a sealed envelope randomisation system"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk No information about whether the envelopes were opaque and sequentially numbered
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The study could not be blinded to warmth vs. no warmth
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Video tapes were analyzed by assessors blinded to group assignment – probably, but could the warmer be seen?
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes reported on all infants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The study protocol was not available to us so we could not judge whether there were any deviations from it. We could not find a Trils registration number
Other bias Low risk Appears free of other bias