Gray 2015.
Methods | RCT Painful intervention: vaccination (hepatitis B) Study location: University of Chicago Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA Study period: July to August 2008 |
|
Participants | 29 healthy, full‐term newborns undergoing vaccination Exclusion criteria included preterm birth (< 37 weeks’ completed PMA), birthweight < 2 kg, any Apgar score < 6, congenital abnormalities, medical complications, or drug exposure. Infants with previous oxygen administration, ventilatory support, or NICU admission were excluded |
|
Interventions | Sucrose group (n = 15): 1.0 mL 24 % sucrose 2 min before vaccination Sucrose + warmth group (n = 14): 1.0 mL 24% sucrose 2 min before vaccination + radiant warmth from an infant warmer before the vaccination Infants in the sucrose + warmth group were placed under an Ohmeda Ohio Infant Warmer (Model No. 3000; GE Healthcare, Fairfield, CT), and their clothing was removed, except for a diaper (nappy) |
|
Outcomes | Duration of cry and grimace (s), HR variability and HR | |
Notes | Duration of cry and grimace were provided as means and SDs and in graph form. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and HR reported in graph form Both groups received sucrose |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "We randomly assigned each infant in the study to sucrose alone or sucrose plus warmer groups by using a sealed envelope randomisation system" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | No information about whether the envelopes were opaque and sequentially numbered |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | The study could not be blinded to warmth vs. no warmth |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Video tapes were analyzed by assessors blinded to group assignment – probably, but could the warmer be seen? |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes reported on all infants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The study protocol was not available to us so we could not judge whether there were any deviations from it. We could not find a Trils registration number |
Other bias | Low risk | Appears free of other bias |