Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;2016(7):CD001069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub5

Taddio 2011.

Methods RCT
Painful intervention: venipuncture
Study location: Mother and Infant Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Study period: 20 August 2007 to 22 February 2009
Participants 330 infants mean PMA (SD) 39.5 weeks (1.2)
Liposomal lidocaine group (n = 110) mean PMA (SD) 39.6 weeks (1)
Sucrose group (n = 110) mean PMA (SD) 39.6 weeks (1.3)
Sucrose liposomal lidocaine group (n = 110) mean PMA (SD) 39.6 weeks (1.3)
Interventions Liposomal lidocaine group: 1 g liposomal lidocaine 4% cream to the dorsum of the hand, occluded by a dressing (Tegaderm) for 30‐40 min
Sucrose group: 2 mL 24% sucrose solution, administered by mouth using a syringe over 1‐2 min
Sucrose liposomal lidocaine group: both sucrose and liposomal lidocaine as described above
Placebos were used for liposomal lidocaine and sucrose (i.e. double‐dummy design), so that all infants received a topically administered cream (liposomal lidocaine or placebo cream) and oral solution (sucrose or placebo water)
Outcomes Facial grimacing, cry duration (s),observer‐rated pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 to 10 cm), HR (beats/min), oxygen saturation (%)
Notes Reported no significant adverse effects
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table used
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Concealment of treatment allocation was achieved by carrying out randomization and dispensing functions offsite
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants and personnel blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessors blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Efficacy outcomes were not reported in 9 infants and safety outcomes were not repotted in 2 infants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The study protocol was not available to us so we could not judge whether there were any deviations from it
Other bias Low risk Appears free of other bias