Methods |
Study design: parallel RCT
Time frame: April 2001 to December 2003
Follow‐up period: 18 months
|
Participants |
Setting: tertiary, single centre
Country: India
SRNS (proteinuria > 1g/m2/d or > 3+ on dipstick, albumin <2.5 mg/dL, oedema) despite prednisone for 4 weeks at 2 mg/kg/d; initial and late non‐responders with MCD (24), FSGS (14), MesPGN (11); aged 1 to 18 years
-
Number
-
Median age (range)
-
Sex (M/F)
|
Interventions |
IV CPA group
IV CPA 500 mg/m2 monthly (max 1g) for 6 doses; dose increased to 750 mg/m2 monthly if no response at 3 months; dose delayed if WCC < 4000
Maintenance therapy was then started with prednisone: 0.5 mg/kg alternate days to 18 months
Oral CPA + IV DEXA group
Oral CPA 2 mg/kg/d from 3rd to 14th weeks and IV DEXA 5 mg/kg alternate days for 6 doses then every 2 weeks (4 pulses) and then monthly (4 pulses)
Maintenance therapy was then started with prednisone: 0.5 mg/kg alternate days to 18 months
Co‐interventions
|
Outcomes |
Complete (UP/C < 0.2 g/g, albumin > 2.5 g/dL) or partial remission (UP/C 0.2 to 2 g/g, albumin > 2.5 g/dL) at 6 months
Treatment failure: non‐response (UP/C > 2 g/g, albumin < 2.5 g/dL) after 6 months or failure to complete treatment due to serious adverse effect or > 1 serious infection
Favourable outcome at 18 months: maintenance of complete remission or steroid‐sensitive relapses
Adverse events: Hypertension; neurological; severe infection; ophthalmological; steroid related; leucopenia; cystitis; hair loss; vomiting
|
Notes |
Exclusions post randomisation but pre‐intervention: none reported
Stop or end points/s: not reported
Additional data requested from authors: none
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
"Stratified randomisation, in blocks of four, were done separately with computer‐generated numbers to allocate patients with initial and late steroid‐resistance randomly..." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low risk |
"Allocation was concealed in sealed opaque envelopes, which were opened by an associate not involved in the study" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes |
High risk |
No blinding of participants/investigators; lack of blinding could influence management |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Primary outcome was serum albumin + urinary protein; urine protein measured either by urinalysis or UP/C. Unclear how many patients had laboratory measure of proteinuria |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Low risk |
3/52 (6%) patients excluded after randomisation (IV CPA group (1); oral CPA + IV DEXA group (2)) for non‐compliance; unlikely to have influenced results |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Primary outcomes: number in complete or partial remission and adverse effects reported |
Other bias |
Unclear risk |
Funding source not reported |