Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;2016(10):CD012371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012371

Summary of findings 2. CBT versus other psychological therapies for children and adolescents exposed to trauma (short‐term).

Patient or population: children and adolescents exposed to trauma
 Setting: All seven studies were done in community or outpatient settings including child trauma (2) or psychiatric (2) services, child support services (1), domestic violence service (1) and school (1) in the US (4), Netherlands (2), and Iran (1).
 Intervention: CBT
 Comparison: other psychological therapies (short‐term)
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) Numer of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with other therapies (short‐term) Risk with CBT
PTSD diagnosis Study population OR 0.74
 (0.29 to 1.91) 160
 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very lowa,b  
141 per 1000 108 per 1000
 (45 to 239)
Moderate
111 per 1000 85 per 1000
 (35 to 193)
PTSD total symptoms Mean PTSD total symptoms in the intervention group 0.24 standard deviations undefined fewer (0.42 fewer to 0.05 fewer) Small effect size 466
 (7 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderatec  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on assumed risk in the comparison group and relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI)
 CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect but may be substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

aParticipants are likely to have been aware of whether they received active or inactive intervention in both studies, and diagnosis was based on self reported measures in both
 bOnly 2 included studies with a relatively small overall sample number of 287

cParticipants are likely to have been aware of whether they received active or inactive intervention in all studies, and scores were based on self reported measures in 4 studies