Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;2016(10):CD012371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012371

Comparison 16. Sensitivity analysis: attrition bias.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 PTSD diagnosis 7   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Low risk 2 320 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.27 [0.11, 0.65]
1.2 Unclear risk 3 329 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.45, 1.38]
1.3 High risk 2 547 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.06, 1.60]
2 PTSD total symptoms 21   Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Low risk 7 1410 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.38 [‐0.75, ‐0.01]
2.2 Unclear risk 9 1046 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.36 [‐0.67, ‐0.05]
2.3 High risk 5 831 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.30 [‐0.53, ‐0.06]